A case for constitutional amendments - John Gormley

The title describes it all in a nutshell, but to offer a bit in the way of explanation, he's a hate-filled menace. I have never been able to figure out why right wing extremists always resort to name calling. Take a look at his blog and you will see that it is filled with people who love to call people names and these are the people who are calling other people "childish". Go figure.

Why is that almost all people who publish a blog allow people to blog freely, but Gormley has to "review your comments for moderation"? Is that because if he doesn't agree with you, he won't publish your comments, or because he is afraid that some people might actually post the truth, or because people might post how they actually feel about him, or because he posts most of the comments himself?

Rawlco radio executives must really have issues to have this guy on. I mean, he's a one man hate machine. It is likely high time that the decent people in the province rallied to take some kind of action against Rawlco just for keeping this guy on the payroll.

He allows people to post, or posts himself, that delegates at the SFL convention should have their names made public and circulated to their employers as they are an embarrassment. I raise the point that this is illegal under the Freedom of Information and Privacy Act, and that the Constitution allows all citizens freedom of opinion, expression and association.

Does he believe in censorship? I don't, or at least didn't until I started to listen to his crap. When does freedom of speech become hatred? Can you take poetic license because you are on NTR, does that allow you that freedom? Why is it okay for some people to totally disrespect others but not for others? Gormley hates the NDP and labour. When labour fights back, he calls them names and says they are disrespectful?

Gormley - do you like Saskatchewan? If you do, why don't you do us all a big favour and move to Alberta?